Morality Is Not the Same as Law and Custom
Example: In general, morality and religion have jurisdiction over a person`s private thoughts. First, the main difference between morality, law, and religion in a Western system of government is that laws are enforced by the state. For example, many religions believe that drunkenness is a sin. However, an alcoholic can sit quietly at home and shoot one after the other until he loses consciousness, and the police are not allowed to intervene. Example: Laws and notions of morality generally conform to social norms, while some religious practices do not. We live in a society governed by the rule of law; The law has cannibalized the institutions it is supposed to strengthen or interact with. We are encouraged to assume that lawful behavior is the measure of moral behavior. The efforts of an external political power to legislate on conscience are the opposite of usual: habitual behavior encompasses precisely those aspects of social behavior that are traditional, moral and religious – in short, conventional and not legal. In other words, habit is a social morality. The relationship between custom and law is fundamentally one of contradiction, not continuity. Now, on paper, these terms seem pretty clear-cut. However, their application is where things get a bit tricky. In addition, these terms take on very different meanings depending on the place of residence.
For example, they are almost interchangeable in a fundamentalist Islamic state. However, due to time constraints, we limit our discussion to what Western ideology has to say about morality, laws, and religion. But suppose that theists cease such practical and humanistic appeals and return to basing all moral preaching on the will of God. A disturbing irony remained: there are many different gods. (2) The mere fact that religions around the world are able to promote similar moral behavior refutes the idea that only one particular God is the only “true” giver of morality. If only one of the many gods believed in is real, millions of people, though behaving morally, must do so under the influence, inspiration, or command of the FALSE GOD. Therefore, belief in the “good” God should not be very critical in terms of moral behavior. You can even stand by Cicero and profess hypocrisy and get the same result. And when you add that non-theists around the world have shown that they are just as capable of private moral behavior as theists (Buddhists offer perhaps the best example on a large scale), then belief in God turns out to be a minor issue in this whole affair. There is something about human nature that operates on a deeper level than mere theological faith, and that is what serves as a true appeal to moral behavior.
As with laws, the same is true of morality: man seems quite capable of making reasonable and sensitive decisions on his own that influence behavior. In our culture, people are so used to the idea that every law has a legislator, every rule has an executor, every institution has someone in authority, and so on, that the idea that something is different sounds like chaos. If one lives one`s life without reference to an ultimate authority on morality, one`s values and aspirations are considered arbitrary. Furthermore, it is often argued that if everyone tried to live this way, no agreement on morality would be possible and there would be no way to settle disputes between people, because no defense from a particular moral point of view would be possible if there were no absolute point of reference. Law and morality are extrinsically linked and have been used interchangeably since ancient times. However, we can find differences between law and morality, taking into account several main factors. What is the relationship between law and morality? They are NOT the same. You can NOT equate both. Just because something is immoral doesn`t mean it`s illegal, and just because something is illegal doesn`t mean it`s immoral. In an essay of one or two paragraphs, describe the concept of application in terms of law, morality, and religion. Thus, unlike the law, morality rules and regulations are not mandates or actions. Instead, they are beliefs and practices.
Morality and laws are also usually associated with overarching social rules. Religious norms are based on the mandates of a perceived higher power. For this reason, religious norms often exist outside the majority society. In at least one or two pages, describe a scenario that illustrates the similarities and differences between morality, law, and religion, and also explains the role of skill, societal norms, and enforcement. In addition, the law punishes those who break the law and create discrepancies for the lives of others, while there are no such coercive sanctions for those who live immorally or commit immoral acts. However, morality emphasizes that any immoral action is followed by negative consequences that the actor must one day suffer. The law is direct and crude with penalties, while morality may or may not be followed depending on the person`s choice.
