Japanese Legal Terminology
The variety of legal statuses of people who actually or practically hold British citizenship is breathtaking. The British Nationality Act 1981 (in force since 1983) and its subsequent revisions distinguish the following types of status between persons linked to the United Kingdom and the colonies on the basis of nationality. (The terms “existing entity” and “inherited entity” come from me. The qualification of “virtual nationality” also comes from me. Similarly, as a legal status in Japan, “chosenesis” is the status inherited from a person who continues to be identified as a subsidiary of an entity that no longer exists – in this case, the former “elected” subnation of the Empire of Japan. It was the most important term in considerations of legal treatment, especially with regard to position in a family or society. It defines a person`s existence in, say, a family register, as well as the quality of their existence. One exists, when one is born by acquiring the status in a register, as a child, son or daughter, of known or unknown parents. The birth order of a child, as well as the sex and relationship of its parents, also affected the quality of the child`s status. The term is still indispensable for family law today.
Now summarize these three terms in a sentence like “I want to renounce the nationality of Japan” (日本の国籍を離脱したい Nihon no kokuseki o ridatsu shitai). If it is made to a friend at dinner, this statement has consequences only in conversation. If issued in response to a “Notice of Renunciation of Nationality” (国籍離脱届 Kokuseki ridatsu todoke) submitted to the Japanese Ministry of Justice in accordance with the provisions of Japan`s nationality law and related laws, there will be serious legal consequences. Kika did not acquire legal tender until the Nationality Act of 1899. It was only after the implementation of this law that it became possible to naturalize in Japan – to become Japanese by application and permission, rather than by notification and confirmation. John C. Kakinuki was a partner at the law firm of Baker & McKenzie / Tokyo Aoyama Aoki when he joined both boards. In the fall of 2006, however, he ended his 22-year private practice to become general counsel in Tokyo for General Electric Consumer Finance. It was announced that he intends to remain active in the International Trademark Association (INTA) and the American Chamber of Commerce in Japan (ACCJ). He was Chair of the Intellectual Property Committee of the ACCJ for six years and then Governor and Vice-Chair of the ACCJ (Management of the Intellectual Property Website) for two years each.
Note that even after 1899, the term “naturalization” – which refers to a legal procedure for obtaining citizenship by application and permission – did not apply to cases where a foreigner became Japanese by notification, such as when the foreigner married or was adopted by a Japanese – which became possible in 1873 and continued to be possible under the Citizenship Act of 1899. Neither race nor ethnicity are factors to be taken into account in the acquisition of Japanese nationality, and they are not recorded in family registers or census forms. No individual in Japan is legally considered an object of racial ethnic classification. In non-legal contexts, gaikokujin and gaijin are used to identify people perceived as non-Japanese for racial or racial reasons. Like other words of this type, their meaning is subject to a variety of potentially contradictory implications and conclusions. A more complex example would be the different terrains of words such as 日本人 (Nihonjin) in Japanese and “Japanese” in English. It is not only fashionable, but practically reflexive, in Japanese and American society to use these terms with racial implications. And because racial boxing continues to have legal status in the United States, federal and state racial boxing practices encourage the racialization of terms like “Japanese” and “Chinese.” All data contained in the Japanese Law Translation Database System may be quoted, duplicated or reprinted as required. These are unofficial translations. Only original Japanese texts of laws and regulations have legal effect, and translations may only be used as reference material for understanding Japanese laws and regulations. The Government of Japan is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the legislative material provided on this website or for any consequences arising from the use of the information on this website. For the purpose of interpreting and applying the law to legal issues or disputes, users are encouraged to consult the original Japanese texts published in the Official Gazette. The working group was formed in response to the findings of the Judicial Reform Council (司法制度改革審議会), which was established under the aegis of the cabinet in July 1999 to examine Japan`s legal needs for the 21st century. By June 2001, when the Council submitted its final report and recommendations, it had held 63 meetings.
In 1999, a governing council was established to examine Japan`s legal needs in the 20th century. This led to the creation of a working group that spawned a number of study groups and working groups to promote the translation of Japanese laws and regulations into “foreign languages”, i.e. English. The laws that apply to which depend on where you live and the legal status you have in the places – sometimes more than one – where you live your life. Japanese law defines several types of addresses, but only three are important to most people living in Japan. A person registered in Japan thus acquires a legal status that is equivalent to an interlocking community membership – municipal, prefectural and national. These affiliations, along with other personal attributes, determine the scope of the rights and duties of the individual as set forth in the Constitution and other laws. The Council was established “to plan a smooth implementation of the policy, while ensuring coordination among the ministries concerned with regard to the necessary infrastructure to promote the translation of foreign languages from the laws and regulations of our country, in accordance with the decision of the Task Force on the Promotion of the Judicial System, November 26, 2004)” (my translation).
As a term in private international law, “status” conspires with the “capacity” (能力 nōryoku) to determine the legal status of a person entitled to vote and standing for election (determined by elements of status and capacity such as age, nationality, residence, criminal record, and mental capacity). Smith (as Aran Sumisu) was invited to address the Third Internationalization Committee in March 2002. Although he was introduced as Chair of the CCA`s Financial Services Committee, he quickly removed that hat and spoke primarily about the need for internationalization in the insurance and securities industry, from his perspective as a senior executive and legal counsel to AIG companies in Japan. The term “Minzoku” is legally used only to recognize the existence of the “Ainu people” (アイヌの人々 Ainu no hitobito) as a “minority race” or (少数民族 shōsū minzoku) within the Japanese population under various international conventions, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). According to the legal definition, all Japanese have their primary residence mainly in Japan through their affiliation with the municipality responsible for their main registry. But only those who are registered with a municipality at an address in a city, district, city or village in Japan are considered residents of Japan. Japanese who have registered abroad are still connected to Japan through the master registry, but are treated slightly differently in terms of rights and obligations than Japanese residents residing in Japan. “Minzoku” – “clan of partners” or “tribe of people” – does not appear in citizenship law or other laws that provide legal status in the subnations of the Empire of Japan, the term was used by the government of the Empire of Japan. In November 1942, the Ministry of Health integrated all its research organizations to simplify its operations during the war.
The agency was dissolved in May 1946. , which was founded in November 1942, under which several other research agencies were grouped together in order to The Ministry of Health, for example, had a government using a This effort to standardize legal translations in Japan aims to facilitate the translation of more Japanese laws and regulations in a unified manner that would theoretically improve the quality of understanding of Japanese law in Japan. let`s say English. While this is certainly a desirable goal, there are already signs that standard bilingual dictionary standards are lowering rather than raising the bar for translation standards.
